ASU Online is a research university's coursework compressed into seven and a half weeks. The standards are the campus standards and the calendar is not, which is a genuinely demanding combination and the reason its students write in more often than the term length alone would predict.
The reading list, the depth of analysis and the citation expectations are what a large research university asks. The difference is that you are meeting them in half the weeks, often while working, and frequently in two overlapping sessions at once.
That combination rewards front-loading more than anything else. The chart is built on day one, the heaviest items are identified immediately, and drafting runs ahead of the dates rather than into them, because there is no recovery week anywhere in a seven-and-a-half-week session.
Students taking session A and session B courses simultaneously often plan each one sensibly and never look at them together. The result is a fortnight in the middle where both sets of major deliverables land at once, discovered too late to move anything.
Charting both sessions on one page immediately shows that collision, and it is nearly always avoidable by moving work earlier. This is the most common single fix for ASU students and it takes about twenty minutes at the start of a term.
ASU uses remote proctoring, and it is worth being plain: nobody here sits an exam for anyone or touches a testing account. Those sessions are recorded, identity-checked and reviewed after the fact, and the students who come unstuck are the ones who were promised a shortcut.
What is offered is preparation built from the exam's structure, a timed diagnostic to find where misses actually cluster, and practice under real conditions including the clock. That is the part of an exam that can honestly be shared, and it is the part that holds up on the day.
Every course you are carrying in session A and B, with the dates. A mentor familiar with ASU Online replies within two hours.
Both sessions charted on one page so the fortnight where everything lands at once is visible while it can still be moved.
Deliverables in your hands before their dates, and proctored exams prepared for well before the sitting.
Denser rather than harder. The content and the standards are what a research university expects; the calendar is roughly half. That removes recovery time, so one lost week costs proportionally far more. Students who front-load rather than pace evenly find these sessions much more manageable.
It is the single most common ASU difficulty and it is avoidable. Plan them separately and you will hit a fortnight where both sets of major deliverables land together, usually discovered too late to move anything. Chart both sessions on one page at the start and the collision is obvious while there is still time.
No, never. Remote proctoring is recorded, identity-checked and reviewed afterwards, and the students who get caught were generally promised exactly this. Preparation is what can honestly be shared: the exam's structure turned into an hour budget, a timed diagnostic, and full practice under real conditions.
Your own portion is drafted early and placed in the shared document under your name, which protects your mark and gives the instructor a record of who contributed. If the group stalls, having your section finished means you are absorbing others' work rather than starting your own at the deadline.
No. This is an independent guild, not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Arizona State University. The name appears to describe where our mentors have worked and what its sessions demand. Your university is never contacted by us for any reason.
Name the course, the program and the date it is due. A mentor credentialed in that subject reads it and replies with counsel and a figure within two hours. The reading costs nothing, and sometimes the answer is an honest no.
SEND A RAVEN