Two things define a Grand Canyon course: the benchmark assignment that carries a disproportionate share of the grade, and the collaborative learning community that makes part of your mark depend on people you did not choose and cannot make reply.
Benchmark assignments are tied to programmatic competencies, which is why they carry the weight they do and why their rubrics are longer and more specific than an ordinary paper's. They are also frequently the assignment students start last, because the weekly work is louder.
That order is backwards and reversing it is the single highest-value change in a GCU course. The benchmark is planned from the first week and built criterion by criterion, with each competency the rubric names answered in its own visible passage. Markers working through a long rubric should not have to hunt for whether a row was addressed.
The CLC arrangement works when everyone contributes and becomes a genuine problem when they do not. Students routinely find themselves days from a group deadline holding a document nobody else has opened, with their own mark attached to it.
Two things help. The first is producing your own portion early and visibly, in the shared document, with your name on it — which protects you if the instructor is later asked who did what. The second is having your section drafted well ahead so that when the group collapses you are absorbing other people's work rather than starting your own. Both are scheduling, and both are what the plan here is built around.
GCU courses ask for frequent participation across the week, and the volume is what makes students feel permanently behind. The work is not hard; there is simply a lot of it, and it arrives regardless of what else your week contains.
Handing over the weekly drumbeat while keeping the assignments you care about is the most common arrangement here, and it is usually the right one. It returns your evenings without touching the parts of the program you enrolled to learn.
The syllabus, the benchmark rubric, and where the gradebook stands. A GCU-fluent mentor replies within two hours, free.
Built from week one against every criterion, so the assignment carrying the most weight is not the one started last.
Participation filed early each week so it stops competing with the work that decides your grade.
An assignment tied to a programmatic competency your degree has to evidence, which is why its rubric is longer and its weight is higher than an ordinary paper's. Treat it as the assignment the course is built around rather than one of several. Planning it from the first week, instead of the last fortnight, is the highest-value change most GCU students can make.
Yes, and it is a frequent request. Your own portion is drafted early and put into the shared document under your name, which both protects your mark and gives the instructor a record of who contributed. If the group does collapse, having your section already finished means you are absorbing their work rather than starting from nothing.
Yes. Programs there specify their expectations closely, including how sources are handled and how assignments are presented, and markers apply those consistently. Send the assignment's own instructions with the rubric and both are followed as written rather than approximated from a general style guide.
That is the most common arrangement at GCU, because the participation load is heavy and repetitive while the assignments are the part students actually want. Weekly posts and replies are drafted and delivered midweek in your own register, and you post them yourself.
No. This is an independent guild, not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Grand Canyon University. The school is named here to describe where our mentors work and what its courses require. Your university is never contacted by us for any reason.
Name the course, the program and the date it is due. A mentor credentialed in that subject reads it and replies with counsel and a figure within two hours. The reading costs nothing, and sometimes the answer is an honest no.
SEND A RAVEN